It's been awhile since I blogged. I've had family issues, and
not stuff you can talk about on-line unless you have a mommy blog or something.
Enough to say it ate my brain, and I haven't had an independent thought in
months, although I can answer questions, which is weird in itself. I suspect independent thought, and creative stuff live in
that little dark place in your head where "things you don't want to think
about" also live. Sometimes there's room for everything, and sometimes,
there's only room for putting one step in front of the other...and I've been
slogging. It hasn't been caviar and good times.
The last time I was here, I archived most of my
core event workshop. Since then I've been doing a lot of thinking. Maybe I needed
to get everything together to realize core events are simply focal motivation.
Or…maybe I just needed a bigger sample group. Over the last three years, I've
had a lot of opportunities to put my theories into practice, and the last two
workshops (Emotional Structure and the Transformational Arc) solidified a lot of my thoughts on exactly what a core event does and what it controls.
Warning: You might have to click on the pictures if you can't see them clearly. That should (I hope) enlarge them as blogger jpgs. It took such a long time to create the original powerpoint I really want to use the pictures. SLIDES FIXED. All thanks to Tanja who helped me figure out how to add in the right kind of pictures. It should all work now.
Let's look at Kim, my Emotional Structure heroine.
She
has stats, a childhood and I know what she's supposed to do (in a general sort
of way), but numbers and facts aren't "flesh." Stories driven by
emotion are stories driven by character, because story emotion can't exist without real people to feel them. While a story can be
"plot-heavy" and still get emotion across (The Silence of the Lambs),
it can't be plot "driven"
(The Stepford Wives). Plot-driven
stories work with the thinking part of your brain (wow! How horrible is that??)
(Figure out the Code or die!)
A
story laden with emotion is a story driven by character, because people care
about people. Characters shouldn't simply exist to serve the needs of the plot
because they tend to get slapped down when they rebel (my characters won't do
what they're supposed to do) or just sit there. Although it's an easy fix to
"write" them through the motions, you get the emotional connection
between your story and reader by finding out the reasons your characters act
the way they do.
Let's
give Kim a cliché job.
Kim is a struggling bed and
breakfast owner who is taking care of her child after the death of her husband.
And
conveniently make the hero useful.
Jason owns a small
construction company and in his spare time he's an amateur chef.
Kim
needs to add a bathroom to the "Honeymoon suite" and hires Jason. He
was the low bid because he just relocated his company and he needs to show
people what he can do. Jason hits it off well with Cleo (Kim's daughter) and
since Kim can't boil water without burning it, invites them over (he's the single
dad down the street) for dinner. Cleo and Tyra connect and become friends. He
lost his wife because she refused to settle down, and Kim lost her husband. It
should be a marriage made in Heaven—or is
it?
It
"sounds" like there's an emotional component, but it's just set-up
for the story.
1. Kim
hires Jason, the new single dad down the street to fix her bathroom.
2. He
likes her kid (and her!) and invites them over for dinner with his kid.
3. Their
kids get along.
4. Can
they find love together?
Why
not? Nothing is stopping them. Although a story can be "real" like
life, there needs to be a reason for the story to exist. It needs conflict, which
means motivation—not motivation in the terms of GMC where the character is
trying to get to a goal. Kim's goal is not to win the hero. The writer's goal is to get Kim and Jason
together. Kim just wants to take care of
her kid.
This is motivation as a
focal point for the character's actions and reactions in "this" story because a character driven story is hard to
pin down in terms of pure GMC. GMC
is a plotting tool. Focal motivation is a story driver, which is why a
character focused story is called character-driven, because something pushes Kim from pt A to pt B.
There
are three reasons why creating the emotional structure of a story starts during the pre-thinking stage:
- You are writing for a reader in addition to yourself.
- Small changes to the character's core event mean big changes in story events and the depth of the emotional arc.
- You need to understand your character's motivation for the story they're in, not their motivation for your story goal.
For the time being, Kim's story is very simple. I’m
writing a contemporary romance. I have a widowed heroine, adorable child, hot
studly construction single dad, and another adorable child with a golden
retriever. I’ve
hit three inclusive things, children, the protective/self-sacrificing instincts
of a parent and second love because I want my contemporary to appeal to as many
people as possible and I strongly believe in the love a parent feels for their
child, in addition to a second chance at love.
I
picture Kim as a widow. Her husband passed away two years ago. Cleo is about
eight. Kim owns a B&B. She needs to remodel the honeymoon suite because
without a private bath it’s not doing well.
Jason
just moved into the neighborhood. Him and his former wife had an amicable
divorce, and are still friends. He owns the construction business Kim hires to
fix her bathroom, and he’s a hands-on owner.
Unity of emotion is the
primary emotion your protagonist feels during the story, which changes at the transformational
point of a character arc so the end can happen. So far, Kim is a blank slate. I
know her dress size and relationship with her kid, her B&B and a huge
amount about Jason.
Which means Kim's core/focal event needs to
address a couple of things:
- Her relationship with her kid
- Her potential relationship with Jason
- The reason she’s running a B&B instead of settling down in a normal job
- And her relationship with her former husband
We are all products of our
past and environment. Things happen to us to make us who we are. When something
bad, traumatic or on the flip-side, good, happens it creates a set of
reactions, attitudes and emotions that are associated with the event. It
doesn’t have to be one set “time” like a twenty-four hour period, but one set
of actions, like a car crash with the memory of the crash itself, the
aftermath, throwing up on the side of the road, x-rays at the hospital and
being unable to take a deep breath for the next two weeks. Or a car crash where
your kid dies screaming next to you, the
gut-wrenching feeling of being unable to help “and” throwing up on the side of
the road, being unable to take a deep breath for the next two weeks and the
closed casket funeral.
One
event is lighter and has the potential to create less conflict. The other is
dark and serious, and has the potential to create horrible trauma. It's the
same event, but the second event has
more emotional weight because now you’re focused in on what your reader fears (a key component of strong emotional structure; getting the reader to "feel"). A character's core event has the power to change your story. It's not just a focal
point, or a nexus, or even the beginning of the transformational arc. It also
controls the emotional depth of your story, and what
happens in it.
Kim’s baggage and issues create conflict with Jason and his
daughter. Not just outwardly, in her reluctance to talk to, or touch Tyra. Or
in her nightmares and crying jags, but emotionally in her internal conflict.
She's fighting herself at the same time that she’s attracted to Jason. How can she
love another man? Isn’t it a betrayal of her husband, and won’t loving Jason
cause her to lose control of her tightly ordered life? What happens if she
loves him so much she hurts Tyra, another person she’s starting to love?
Can
she ever leave the B&B? It was her husband’s dream to own a B&B, and
her daughter loved running up and down the halls. It hurts to live there, but
it’d hurt more to leave the few memories she has.
Her
emotional arc is her movement from pain, grieving and loss (which is manifested
as being overly controlled and cold) to accepting love back into her life. Her
transformational arc is from overly controlled and cold to open—which allows
the pain in. The pain is the fallout of her realization that she can’t allow it
to control her. She needs to work through it to have a future with Jason.
2 comments:
I do not believe a single mother who was caretaker to her deceased husband during his declining years, and who is also the owner of a B&B to boot, "cannot boil water." Does she have her guests make their own breakfast?
If you want this story to appeal to the masses, she should lose her B&B. It is a luxury job. How many people would kill for a job like that, if they could afford the kind of home that is needed to operate as a B&B? She could pretend she can't boil water in her initial interactions with Jason, when she finds out he likes to cook, in an attempt (successful) to get invited over to dinner at his place. Later she has to maintain the charade when he is over at her house to fix things while she is cooking for guests, with some comedic potential. This minor white lie can foreshadow a larger deception, that she is hugely upside down on her mortgage, her home is in foreclosure, and she's not even sure she can pay Jason. Maybe she was hoping to fix up the home quick and short sell it. Her major dishonesty makes her feel unworthy of him as things get serious, she may do things to sabotage the relationship or drive him away. If she comes clean, will he feel used? Can he trust she's not trying to hook up with him for his money? For a real happy ending, maybe they work things out and with his help, she can keep her B&B because he sells his house to raise the money to save it. Or, for a deeper ending, perhaps she loses her home, but regains her integrity, and we see later on she's married & sharing his home, and she spends her day at a shelter for abuse victims, making them breakfast and fixing the place up, as a parallel to what she did at her B&B, but even more rewarding (in non-monetary terms). And she's happy. This ending can be foreshadowed if one of Jason's early selling points is we find out he volunteers some time doing free repairs for the shelter. This can be one of those very early "make this character lovable' moments. It can be built on midway through when she's fighting with Jason, maybe throwing this out as an example of how he's too good for her, and in a rage he confesses he only volunteers there for the PR and doesn't give a shit about the people there. It may not be entirely true, but there is some truth that there was a profit motive underlying it. We see no one is perfect. Well, there's one way to go... all rights reserved...
Thanks for the input, Ken. I never really thought...well, sometimes--about how I appear to the outside, or what tropes are ingrained in me. But I always pictured Kim as a SAM (stay at home mom) who is totally reluctant to get involved with another man. Guess I'm a diehard romantic and after everything shakes down, a romance writer to my toenails. :)
Post a Comment